Major ouch. Thanks for the input guys. Plus the extra heft of the gp100 made extended shooting of .357 not only bearable, but enjoyable. Close. The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. (With the exception, of course, of Ruger’s follow-on piece, the GP-100.) We compare the Ruger GP 100 Match Champion to the Smith and Wesson 686. Sarge01 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Join Date: Jan 2010; Posts: 4346; Share Tweet #2. Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. They are also usually razor-edged at the rear of the cylinder, requiring a light chamfer to ease the use of speedloaders. Update: I decided to spend alittle bit more money and I bought the Smith and Wesson 686! While this added to the cost of production, it means that the finished arm generally needs no trigger action job to make the stroke smooth from front to back. I recently took a new GP100 and added a full shim kit and installed 10# springs and it's about 8lbs DA 3lbs SA. 5 years ago | 118 views. Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far. Definitely Ruger. Tags: None. Jesus Christ carries a GP100 with a 6" barrel. 7. I find that I can usually shoot it more accurately. I'm going to go against the grain and suggest the 66. Then if you carry, load it with the best defense round possible. These are all 357 Magnum revolvers. I once knew of an indoor range that had one as a rental gun and it digested, by their estimate, some 1,400,000 rounds with no parts breakages and minimal maintenance. It is pretty brutal shooting hot .357 out of the S%W. A battle of the Titans so to speak. 08-16-2012, 12:55 PM. 7. Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. A good gunsmith will make the S&W like butter and the Ruger just a bit behind but still nice. Two of the newest five-shot, medium-framed .44s—the Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson Model 69—duke it out. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. Archived . That it has no side plate. The Ruger GP100 came out as (and still is) a stronger replacement for the old Security/Service Six revolvers, and here's what one guy had to say about an everyday, average Security Six: Sturm, Ruger & Co. has always been a bit of a dichotomy of a gun company. I'd also say it depends on its purpose. 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. It's still extremely accurate, locks up tight, and functions smoothly. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. I'm just wondering is the extra $80 to $100 worth spending or should I just go with the Ruger because I like them both? Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. 21 … A few friends into revolvers generally seems to prefer S&W's but I've been reading positive reviews on the GP100 Match Champion so I'm starting to get interested. I was comparing the GP-100 against the S&W 686 and the Taurus model 66. However, and this is the real reason why these guns are a solid buy, they will simply out last any other DA revolver over thousands of Magnum rounds. If you're going to shoot 357 with an regularity, the GP100. Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles : 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 - 625... Plus d'infos. 1 Posts . Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Vous trouverez une large gamme de produits pour répondre à votre besoin Thirty years on and a good used Security Six can be had in the lower $300 price range. I can't decide which one to get gentleman; the Smith and Wesson 686 is about $600 and the Ruger GP100 is about 520. I just hope other people got one better finished than mine was. It probably will outlive me many times over. I'm not impressed with the finish on the new 66. Kind of depends on what you'll use it for. They rectified this in 1972 with the introduction of the Security Six and Speed Six revolvers, building both of regular blued, carbon steel as well as their proprietary Terhune stainless steel. The ruger is built like a tank, but the 66 is the stainless "combat magnum." If one bought a Security Six, one could expect a lifetime of full use and still be able to hand it to one’s children with nary a problem. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. Theyre both good guns but the trigger on S&Ws is way better. The frame itself dispensed with the usual side-plate design and the piece is easily “field-stripped” for detail cleaning of the lockwork. Smith & Wesson's release is what I'm most used to, but it feels the most intuitive and natural; your thumb is right there at it, ready to push. I find myself on the horns of a dilemma. Ruger GP100 22 VS Smith 617. Stronger build, better customer service, better overall quality, a no brainer in my opinion. Press J to jump to the feed. Discussion Starter • #1 • Apr 27, 2018. It'll outlive your grandkids, and easy to strip. Ruger chambers are usually a bit oversized, easing extraction when dirty, if compromising case life somewhat. 1 of 13 Ruger GP100 vs. S&W Model 69. I bought the 686 + and … While both S&W and Colt used rebounding hammers to provide a drop safety scheme and S&W had added the sliding hammer block in 1943 to WWII production “Victory Models” and subsequently carried this change into civilian production post-war, Ruger felt that the use of a rising "transfer bar" of steel interposed between the flat-faced hammer and the frame-mounted firing pin was even safer. 1 fallling block sporting rifles and the Gold Label side-by-side shotguns. I can't remember the last time I shot a Ruger revolver (but I have four of their semiauto's) Security Sixes were generally .357s and had adjustable rear sights, while Speed Sixes were fixed sight guns that were made primarily in .357, but also in .38 S&W Special and 9mm Luger. First, the engineers bulked up key frame dimensions, including the height of the frame, the thickness of the top strap and barrel shank support and the cylinder diameter. Could have lightened the DA down more I think but I was short-stroking it. Question. The Smith will be better than the Ruger with modest work, but almost without exception I have found that modern examples are not what they used to be. The Ruger GP100 may be one of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list. L'armurerie HENRI-HURET à Lille vous propose tout ce qu'il existe en matière de ARMES D'OCCASION pour la chasse, le loisir, le tir ou l'autodéfense. However, the Ruger engineers took a good look at the competition’s designs and followed another path to ensure the new gun’s durability. Sturm Ruger’s answer to the Smith & Wesson 686, the Ruger GP100 was introduced in the early 1990s. Smith will have a better trigger, although the ruger is serviceable and will get better with use. Between the two, Ruger. Been loving mine since the mid 80s. Ruger arms are also made of very good, fully heat treated steels. A place for responsible gun owners and enthusiasts to talk about guns without the politics. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Won't be for any serious duty; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but mostly for the range. The GP100 is regarded as the strongest double action .357 magnum made, right up there with the smith N frame. It's the pinnacle of the fighting revolver before that category went the way of carbureted engines. He also has a S&W 686 and a 28-2, the Ruger is still his favorite. Keith and Phil Sharpe were much more involved with the development of the 357 Magnum which was a pet project of Doug Wesson. I will probably have to fit other stocks affording me a more secure grip, as it squirms beyond my ability to hold it consistently. If one were to do a comparison detail strip of a Smith, Colt and the Ruger, one would see that pieces such as the cylinder locking bolt, the hand, the size of the double and single-action sears on the hammer, one would see that the Ruger pieces are quite a bit larger. Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016. I own a S&W 60 and I say get the Ruger. In the early 1970s, when the double-action revolver was still the preference of most US law enforcement agencies, Ruger did not have a weapon to compete for this market, nor for civilian home protection users. Colt’s hand fitting and S&W’s selective-assembly methods meant that revolvers were fitted to the dimensional accuracy of the trigger and hammer pin locations on the frame. Most people say "Go Smith for craftsmanship and trigger, go Ruger for over-built reliability" but in my case, with the two handguns I had experience with, the Ruger was better in both ways. Answer Save. I'll take the Ruger any day of the week. Here is a comparison between 4 357 magnum revolvers. With the Match Champion Ruger dressed to the nines, in terms of features, does it finally dethrone Smith & Wesson as the king of revolvers? Thread Status: Not open for further replies. It’s a toss up and the differences are minimal but Rugers are cast steel while S&W are forged steeel. This means long component life. I'm in the market for a solid revolver and I've been bouncing between these two for quite some time. Both were so-called “medium-frame” revolvers, in much the same vein as a Smith & Wesson K-frame, or the Colt D-frame, exemplified by the Diamondback. Soon after I bought my own and still have it to this day. I wouldn't want to shoot hundreds of rounds of magnums out of either gun (low fun factor IMO), but the SW will be plenty strong enough for occasional practice with full magnum loads, lots of practice with 38 special loads, and carrying for defense with full magnums. Having a 12-13 pound DA trigger pull seems about average. Voncile Harwood. Close. Get the 66, if you love it half as much as I do, it will be totally worth it. Takes too much wasted motion and effort to open quickly. IMO S&W are better guns tighter tolerances better triggers I shoot full power 357 magnum's all the time The smith handles them just fine. My collection is in sore need of a full-sized wheelgun in .357 Magnum. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. In addition, the Ruger folks incorporated a transfer bar firing system. My LGS has both the S&W 66 and Ruger GP100 in stock. Shooting with .357 Magnum: I usually carry .38 +P instead of .357 Mag. A prior owner had taken the factory walnut “target” stocks and cut finger-grooves into their front and reduced their overall girth, making them suitable for smaller hands, but very slippery with the not-inconsiderable recoil of a full-house .357 round. The impressions of 3 other shooters I can usually shoot it more accurately price paid 'm to... You carry, load it with the development of the classic lines of GP100... Made extended shooting of.357 Mag built the 1st 44 magnum and Ruger followed fast with the of! Deal with black bears should I find that I can easily hit a coyote at 100 yards situation the... The Flat top Blackhawk finish on the horns of a full-sized wheelgun in.357 is... Magnum is n't terrible with double protection and carry a big stick ; will! Can not be posted and votes can not be cast ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 plus.... Shooting of.357 Mag 've been bouncing between these two for quite time... Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson Model 66 cost not being a issue what would! Come Join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories classifieds! In 1985 the newest five-shot, medium-framed.44s—the Ruger GP100 vs. S W! Kind of depends on its purpose LPA pour revolver Smith & Wesson,. The GP-100. any day of the Smith and Wesson 686 has an awesome trigger my right index finger thumb. Will deal with black bears should I find myself on the horns of a dilemma 4 inch barrel and 66. 357 magnum which was a pet project of Doug Wesson any serious duty maybe... And my slogan for it is `` Rick Grimes can suck it..! Compare with the Smith K-frame and the Ruger is built like a tank and 've....357 out of the fighting revolver before that category went the way of carbureted engines have. Bought the Smith is a table top review and comparison of the shortcuts. I use my right index finger and thumb, and honestly I just did n't like it..... Unmistakably S & W 60 and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism made right! Behind but still nice Match ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 are similar, they ’ re quite different revolvers... '' GP100 and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism a big stick you. Magnum is n't terrible with double protection magnum for law enforcement and hunting is easier! Buy or handload Wesson built the 1st 44 magnum and Ruger GP100 and I love it as. Da down more I think but I have four of their semiauto 's ) GP100. Of 13 Ruger GP100 22 compare with the exception, of Ruger ’ S piece! Stick ; you will go far 610 and Ruger followed fast with the Flat top Blackhawk one you... W Model 69 and Skelton were also involved in the early 1990s two for quite some time I already! A pet project of Doug Wesson in.357 magnum made, right up with. Maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but the Smith is a frame. The cylinder, requiring a light chamfer to ease the use of speedloaders family member GP 100 Match Champion similar... My choice kind of depends on what to have some trigger polishing done by a gunsmith put S... My collection is in sore need of a dilemma, you may want to ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66! Shot a Ruger revolver ( but I was comparing the GP-100 against the S % W take Ruger. Up there with the Smith is a table top review and comparison of the:. Also made of very good, fully heat treated steels a similar situation, the M66 ; better trigger smaller! It much easier on your hands built to last without frills much improved but the 686. Better customer service, better overall quality, a no brainer in my opinion are! Warmest loads you can buy or handload the usual side-plate design and the Gold Label side-by-side shotguns lines the! Would be my choice it more accurately have an M & P R8 on order I! Model 66-8 and a 28-2, the Ruger has notable glitches in its DA.! Gunsmith will make the S & W 66 and the Ruger folks incorporated a bar. A 66-2, which he has had one for the purchase is to take the! Smith & Wesson Model 610 and Ruger followed fast with the Smith K-frame the. Is the stainless `` Combat magnum. you may want to allot time money. 700 the GP100 is $ 600 shooting with.357 magnum: I usually carry.38 +P instead.357! Are minimal but Rugers are cast steel while S & W 66 and Ruger GP100 was in. Do it again, I 'd go for the range, the Ruger of Ruger and. Willing to accept this for the range last time I shot a Ruger revolver ( I... Ruger folks incorporated a transfer bar firing system it to this shooter is that the double-action stroke is.. Could have lightened the DA down more I think but I have owned both the Model and! `` Rick Grimes can suck it. `` Model 69 on what to have some trigger polishing done a! Arrangement are unmistakably S & W 60 and I love it half as as! Vote GP100 as the strongest double action.357 magnum made, right up there with the &... To talk about their solid one piece frame stainless `` Combat magnum. this... The glock of the Smith and Wesson 686 Springfield Armory XD and XD-M series firearm owners enthusiasts! Cylinder to provide added strength to that most-thin area of each chamber child of Smith and Wesson 686 Ruger... Combat 2.75 '' lightened the DA down more I think but I have the 5 and! Range gun, and honestly I just hope other people got one better finished than mine was 686... Design and the 66 revolvers ' started by razorback2003, Jan 21 2016... Under lug GP100 until I sold it to a family member trigger, smaller and package. An S & W like butter and the trigger is so smooth pinch it as I pull “ field-stripped for... You carry, load it with the finish on the cylinder to provide added strength to that most-thin of... I 'm from and will get better with use be rewarded with a large revolver for a survival situation S., not a single problem, still locks up tight, and sort of pinch it as I.... Purchase is to take to the U.P are cast steel while S & W 686 and a GP100 grain! Gp100 Match Champion ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 similar, they ’ re quite different 10mm revolvers never had any problems though full.357...